View in browser
After seven decades of "civil rights" activism, we have a huge percentage of the black population that believes murder ought to be legal if against a white person.

If you think I'm joking, you should take a look at social media right now, and see the kinds of deranged and savage posts that are getting huge numbers of "likes."

This is what trillions of dollars, a legal revolution, and white people disadvantaging their own children for generations now has yielded us.

The white American public is more hated than ever before, for allegedly perpetuating "white supremacy."

If that were really true, black students ought to pretend to be white on college applications, to get all the white advantages that would accrue to them from, you know, a white supremacist society. Of course, they do no such thing.

That's because the truth is this: white people, in the seven decades since the civil rights movement, crippled their own children with preferential policies that favored much less qualified black applicants in schooling and employment, and a black student would have to be out of his mind to pretend to be white on a college or employment application.

Any employment qualification that blacks couldn't meet at the same rate as whites has had to be thrown out (or you bankrupt yourself in court by trying to show, with a team of vulture lawyers after you, that the requirement was absolutely necessary).

Countless jurisdictions have had to throw out entry exams entirely after no amount of dumbing them down could get enough black students to pass them.

On Tuesday I wrote to you about "gifted and talented" programs, whose elimination in many jurisdictions was driven by the "disparate impact" doctrine: if it affects the races disproportionately, it's gone.

I won't repeat that information here; you'll find it in Tuesday's email.

The disparities are evident even at the very beginning of the educational process. The National Center for Educational Statistics found that blacks entering kindergarten were already disproportionately testing in the bottom quarter of students in reading, math, and general knowledge.

Behavioral differences are also evident that early, and they persist into the future. On average, black students are much less likely than whites to be described by kindergarten teachers as attentive, eager to learn, and persistent in carrying out assigned tasks, and they are more likely to be described as argumentative, quick tempered, and violent.

These discipline disparities persist over time. Later in life blacks are 2 1/2 times as likely to be suspended or expelled from school as whites.

Faced with statistics like these, so-called civil rights groups typically accuse white teachers of arbitrarily singling out blacks for punishment. But to the contrary, black teachers have been found to be even more critical of black students than white teachers are.

Moreover, Asian students are less than half as likely as whites to be suspended or expelled, and it is surely unreasonable to ask us to believe that an anti-white, pro-Asian bias permeates the American educational system.

And educational disparities between the races persist even when social class is taken into account, so that comfortable explanation doesn't work.

The crime statistics tell us everything: if you based your opinions on TV or the movies, you would think the big problem in America is white-on-black violence. In fact, the reality is so overwhelmingly the opposite that most people would be shocked to learn the real numbers: per 10,000 whites, 3.4 violent crimes are committed against blacks. Per 10,000 blacks, 153 violent crimes are committed against whites.

As time has gone on, special accommodations for blacks, and disabilities placed on whites, have only grown more intense.

Let me repeat some numbers I sent you not long ago (and these include the further issue of discrimination against men):

In 2023 the percentage of white men in tenure-track faculty positions at Harvard declined from 39 percent in 2014 to 18 percent.

Here are some other numbers we now know, that also incorporate the anti-male bias in hiring:

TV/Hollywood Writers: White men comprised roughly 48% of lower-level TV writers in 2011, dropping to 11.9% by 2024.

Medical school matriculants: White men accounted for 31% in 2014, declining to 20.5% in 2025.

The Atlantic staff: In 2013: 53% male / 89% white; by 2024: 36% male / 66% white.

University faculty hiring (tenure-track): At UC Berkeley, white men comprised 52.7% of new tenure-track faculty hires in 2015, dropping to 21.5% in 2023.

Humanities/social sciences faculty hires: UC Irvine hired 64 tenure-track assistant professors in humanities and social sciences since 2020 — only 3 (4.7%) were white men.

At UC Santa Cruz, of 59 assistant professors in Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences (2020–2024), only 2 (3%) were white men.

Law school matriculants: White men accounted for 31.2% of law school matriculants in 2016, falling to 25.7% in 2024.

Corporate/tech entry- and mid-level (specifically Amazon): Entry-level “professionals” (college graduates) were 42.3% white male in 2014. By 2024, mid-level managers had fallen from 55.8% white male in 2014 to 33.8% (nearly 40% decline).

Tech workforce (specifically Google): White men represented nearly 50% of the workforce in 2014, dropping to less than one-third by 2024 (a roughly 34% relative decline).

Four years ago a survey of a thousand hiring managers in the United States came out that showed 16 percent of such managers had been expressly told to stop hiring white men.

Further, 48 percent of hiring managers say they have been instructed to prioritize "diversity" over merit, and 53% believe they will lose their jobs if they don’t hire accordingly.

All across the country there are special programs, of every shape and size, for minority applicants. If you had any idea of the scale of it, you would be shocked -- no matter how much you think you know about the subject.

Instead of the kind of gratitude you might expect from people who have benefited from the most systematic effort in any society to assist a minority group, it is never enough, and the recipients will scream "RACIST" in your face even for pointing any of this out.

We can hope that the Karmelo Anthony case accelerates the coming of the day when whites say: we have done everything humanly possible, including disadvantaging our own children, and in return we have received only hatred and contempt. Enough is enough.

Now, a pivot on the matter of college in particular:

A lot of parents have figured out that in many cases college is an expensive racket. At the same time, they understandably worry: it's easy to urge my child to blaze a trail and do something other than college, but might he thereby wind up unemployable?

Coming up this Saturday, my friend Amy Curtis, whose relevant credentials are as long as my arm, is offering a free session to help you and your teen figure out the right path for your particular case.

It's called "5 Myths About College, and 10 Significantly Cheaper Alternatives."

Those five myths cost many families tens of thousands of dollars.

College can indeed be the right path for some people, but you need to examine all the options before making a potentially six-figure mistake.

I'm not an affiliate for Amy; I just know this will help my readers.

Register here:
Tom Woods

P.S. Denver and San Diego people: reserve your spot at the murder mystery dinner parties I'm holding in your cities! Details here: https://www.WoodsMystery.com


 
 






This email was sent to dianaaudrey@gmail.com
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
Tom Woods · PO Box 701447 · Saint Cloud, FL 34770 · USA