21 car century insurance

It's important for you to understand the rules of American society, and you can rely on ol' Woods here to keep you updated.

One rule, which we experienced during Covid, is that "misinformation" is when YOU openly question official dogma. The official dogma itself can never be "misinformation," no matter how obviously ridiculous it is and no matter how thoroughly refuted it one day becomes.

Over the past couple of days we have learned another rule: Jewish/Israeli groups may openly cheer and boast that their money defeated a congressman, but YOU may not joke about it, because then you are an anti-Semite.

Thomas Massie began his concession speech by apologizing for being a little late: he had been trying to reach his opponent to concede the race but it was hard tracking him down in Tel Aviv.

Oh, boy, did the policemen of thought and speech hate that one.

Now if Chinese or Russian interests had poured tens of millions into someone's campaign, the very same people pretending to be outraged by Massie's remark would consider it a moral imperative to mock that money. Well, what's good for the goose is good for the gander, as they say.

I've seen so many influencers on X claiming that Massie lost because he just wasn't a team player, didn't vote for the One Big Beautiful Bill, etc., and that it had nothing at all to do with the tens of millions from a foreign interest. (Then why did those people spend the tens of millions?)

But Marjorie Taylor Greene did vote for the OBBB, and that didn't save her. Meanwhile, Mike Lawler, who is a disaster on Trump's signature issue, immigration, had Trump out campaigning for him!

So no, I don't believe that nonsense because it doesn't fit reality.

John Podhoretz openly boasted that "Jewish money" defeated Massie. "We have to use what means there are at our disposal, and…that is Jewish money!"

Ha'aretz just reported that "pro-Israel spending" indeed "achieved its goal in Kentucky."

AIPAC boasted that it filled Massie and Greene's seats with compliant congressmen.

Video from the "Ed Gallrein" victory party showed about two dozen people there. Yeah, this whole thing sure was an organic and spontaneous expression of the will of the people!

Since it's now obvious to everyone that a foreign country has veto power over who may represent us, I think we losers should at least be allowed to joke about it, as a consolation. Surely our overlords can deign to permit us at least that much.

David Stockman, Ronald Reagan's director of the Office of Management and Budget, was even blunter than ol' Woods:

In a peaceful, non-interventionist Republic, foreign countries would not spend tens of millions in one-off Congressional races because there would be no policy favors, fiscal lucre and military aids to lobby for. And AIPAC would not even exist, let alone be bragging about replacing the two greatest advocates of peace and liberty in the US Congress with two paid lackeys with their noses up the place in Bibi's anatomy where the sun don't shine. Bring the Empire Home. All of it.

When Charlie Kirk was killed, I happened to be running a workshop in Orlando with a bunch of great people, and I'm glad for that -- it was a shocking thing, and it was a relief that in those circumstances I was surrounded by like-minded people.

Same for this: I'm glad I'm in Philadelphia with friends this week, because it has lifted my spirits after the Massie travesty.

Last night I held the murder mystery dinner party I'd scheduled for Philly; a couple of people couldn't make it at the last minute but it was a great time (I played a chef, as you can see):